Mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 147:8

האי תנא דבי רבי עקיבא היא דמרבי ליה לערל כטמא דתניא רבי עקיבא אומר (ויקרא כב, ד) איש איש לרבות את הערל

— It is the Tanna who [is in disagreement with] R. Joseph the Babylonian. For it was taught: The burning<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of the red heifer. V. Num. XIX, 5. ');">¹⁹</span> by an onan or by one who is still short of atonement is valid; but R. Joseph the Babylonian said: That of the onan is valid but that of him who is short of atonement is not valid.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As the first Tanna differs from R. Joseph in respect of the man who was short of atonement, he presumably differs also in respect of the uncircumcised. ');">²⁰</span> R. Isaac also is of the opinion that the uncircumcised is forbidden to eat [second] tithe. For R. Isaac stated: Whence is it deduced that the uncircumcised is forbidden to eat [second] tithe? 'Thereof' was stated in respect of [the] tithe,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. infra for further explanation. ');">²¹</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 147:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.